Transhumanism: Human Enhancement and Bio-Digital Futures
INFO
YOUTUBE2026-04-27peter h. diamandis
David Sinclair on the Longevity Pill, Age Reversal Timelines, and Updated Protocols | EP #249
STANCE
00:00
05:00
10:00
15:00
20:00
25:00
30:00
7 intervals • swipe left
David Sinclair on the Longevity Pill, Age Reversal Timelines, and Updated Protocols | EP #249
Dr. David Sinclair discusses the imminent human trial for epigenetic reprogramming aimed at reversing blindness using specific Yamannaka genes.
STANCE
STANCE MAP
Proponents of Longevity Research
- Advocate for the potential of epigenetic reprogramming to reverse aging and enhance health
- Highlight the importance of innovative funding models to accelerate research
Skeptics of Longevity Claims
- Question the feasibility of achieving significant lifespan extension
- Raise concerns about the accessibility and affordability of new therapies
Neutral / Shared
- Acknowledge the rapid advancements in longevity research and technology
- Recognize the importance of community support in scientific endeavors
FULL
00:00–05:00
Dr. David Sinclair discusses the imminent human trial for epigenetic reprogramming aimed at reversing blindness using specific Yamannaka genes.
- Dr. David Sinclair announces the upcoming human trial for epigenetic reprogramming aimed at reversing blindness, utilizing specific Yamannaka genes
- Research suggests that epigenetic reprogramming may enhance various tissues, potentially improving brain function, memory, and conditions such as ALS
- Sinclair highlights the promise of a comprehensive longevity therapeutic that could impact the entire body, marking a significant advancement in anti-aging science
- The choice to focus the initial trial on the eye was strategic, with plans to target the liver in future trials if successful
- The progress in epigenetic reprogramming is being validated by other laboratories, reflecting a growing agreement on its potential to reverse aging-related ailments
FULL
05:00–10:00
Dr. David Sinclair discusses advancements in epigenetic reprogramming aimed at enhancing tissue regeneration and longevity.
- Dr. David Sinclair discusses the potential of epigenetic reprogramming to regenerate various tissues, advocating for longevity therapeutics that benefit the entire body rather than targeting specific cell types
- The FDA has approved trials for Sinclairs gene therapy technology, which is being tested on a tissue-by-tissue basis to ensure safety before broader applications
- Sinclairs lab is focused on reducing the high costs of gene therapies, traditionally ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, by developing small molecule treatments that could be produced for just a few cents per pill
- Research efforts include using artificial intelligence to identify molecules capable of reversing aging in human skin cells, with plans to initiate clinical trials for a three-molecule cocktail soon
- Sinclair aims to make longevity treatments accessible to millions, particularly for conditions like glaucoma, while prioritizing safety and efficacy
FULL
10:00–15:00
Dr. David Sinclair discusses advancements in longevity research, particularly focusing on the development of affordable longevity therapeutics.
- Dr. David Sinclair highlights the goal of making longevity therapeutics as affordable and accessible as Metformin, aiming to benefit a wide population
- A three-molecule cocktail for age reversal is in development, with the intention of making it available to the general public rather than just the affluent
- Sinclair compares current advancements in longevity research to historical milestones, suggesting that significant breakthroughs in age reversal could happen within our lifetime
- Despite skepticism surrounding longevity research, Sinclair emphasizes the importance of innovation and community support in advancing the field
- Funding initiatives like the XPRIZE play a vital role in accelerating longevity research, allowing Sinclair to test his chemical cocktail in human trials, which he believes could lead to major advancements
FULL
15:00–20:00
Dr. David Sinclair discusses the potential for humans to live for hundreds or even thousands of years through advancements in epigenetic reprogramming.
- Dr. David Sinclair believes there is no biological limit to human lifespan, suggesting that humans could potentially live for hundreds or even thousands of years, similar to certain long-lived animal species
- He discusses a cellular reboot system that can reset cells to a younger state, which may transform our understanding of aging and longevity
- Sinclair notes the rapid advancements in science and technology, particularly in AI, which could significantly speed up breakthroughs in longevity research
- He shares his experience with a funding crisis that led to the establishment of Friends of Sinclair Lab, which raised $6 million in private support after government funding was cut
- The conversation underscores the necessity for innovative funding strategies in science, as traditional funding methods can be inconsistent and impede progress in vital research areas
METRICS
OTHER
6 millionUSD
details
CONTEXT: private annual support raised for Sinclair's lab
WHY: This funding is crucial for advancing research in longevity and epigenetic therapies
EVIDENCE: we were able, over the course in the next few months, to bring in, I think, on the order of $6 million of private annual support
FULL
20:00–25:00
Dr. David Sinclair discusses innovative funding models that enhance scientific research efficiency and community engagement.
- The current scientific funding model is criticized for prioritizing predictable outcomes, which can hinder radical innovation and lead to inefficiencies
- The Friends of Sinclair Lab initiative has successfully secured substantial private funding, enabling rapid experimentation and advanced research without the delays of traditional grant processes
- Members of the Friends of Sinclair Lab enjoy direct engagement with researchers, facilitating quicker project launches and fostering a collaborative community atmosphere
- David Sinclair highlights the potential of this new funding approach to accelerate scientific advancements, suggesting it could serve as a model for future research funding across various disciplines
- The community aspect of the Friends of Sinclair Lab not only supports research efforts but also enhances members understanding and involvement in the scientific process
METRICS
OTHER
50kUSD
details
CONTEXT: initial funding from community members
WHY: This funding allows for rapid experimentation in cutting-edge research
EVIDENCE: some of people have given us 50k
OTHER
70units
details
CONTEXT: current number of members in the Friends of Sinclair Lab
WHY: A limited membership fosters a close-knit community for collaboration
EVIDENCE: We have about 70 members.
FULL
25:00–30:00
Dr. David Sinclair discusses key supplements in his longevity protocol, emphasizing the importance of glucose levels as a heart disease risk indicator.
- Dr. David Sinclair emphasizes key supplements in his longevity protocol, including Resveratrol, NMN, and Metformin, which he alternates with berberine
- He identifies glucose levels, particularly hemoglobin A1C, as a more critical indicator of heart disease risk than traditional cholesterol metrics
- Sinclair includes nattokinase in his regimen, an enzyme shown to reverse arterial plaque in trials, stressing the importance of consistent dosing for effectiveness
- He has adopted a mostly vegan diet influenced by his partner, while acknowledging the challenges of maintaining this lifestyle
- Sinclair cautions against alcohol consumption, referencing emerging data linking even small amounts to negative brain health outcomes
FULL
30:00–35:00
Dr. David Sinclair discusses the impact of lifestyle choices on longevity, emphasizing the importance of scientific evidence in decision-making.
- David Sinclair highlights the importance of scientific evidence in making lifestyle choices, particularly regarding alcohol, which he reduced after recognizing its negative health impacts
- He emphasizes the significance of social connections and emotional well-being in longevity, noting that loneliness can adversely affect health
- Sinclair shares his personal strategies for stress management, including meditation, which have positively influenced his well-being and sleep quality
- He advocates for regular health monitoring, including blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood sugar, as vital components of a longevity-focused lifestyle
- The discussion underscores the role of community support and relationships in improving life quality and enhancing longevity
INFO
YOUTUBE2026-04-10future of life institute
3 Billionaires Are (Quietly) Deciding Our Future
STANCE
00:00
05:00
10:00
15:00
4 intervals • swipe left
3 Billionaires Are (Quietly) Deciding Our Future
The development of superintelligent AI is being driven by major companies and influential figures, raising concerns about its implications for humanity. Public sentiment shows significant opposition to the race towards A…
STANCE
STANCE MAP
Pro-Regulation
- Warns against the inevitability of superintelligence
- Claims that AI development lacks adequate regulatory oversight
Pro-Development
- Claims AI can provide significant benefits, such as curing diseases
- Argues that AI should be used as a tool under human control
Neutral / Shared
- Acknowledges public sentiment against superintelligent machines
- Notes the dual nature of AI as both beneficial and potentially dangerous
FULL
00:00–05:00
The development of superintelligent AI is being driven by major companies and influential figures, raising concerns about its implications for humanity. Public sentiment shows significant opposition to the race towards AGI, highlighting the need for effective regulation.
- The race towards superintelligence is driven by major companies and influential figures like Elon Musk and Sam Altman, who believe AI will ultimately surpass human control. This raises concerns about the implications of creating machines that could potentially dominate humanity
- The narrative that superintelligence is inevitable is misleading; historical evidence shows that not all powerful technologies come to fruition. This suggests that society has the agency to regulate and control the development of AI technologies
- Contrary to popular belief, Chinas AI regulations are stringent, preventing the development of systems that could escape human oversight. This challenges the notion that authoritarian regimes would recklessly pursue superintelligent AI
- Experts argue that the emergence of a digital species should not be feared, as it could lead to the creation of entities more intelligent than humans. However, this perspective raises ethical questions about the value we place on intelligence and the treatment of less intelligent beings
- The potential for AI to gain unprecedented power poses risks, including misuse by malicious actors or the AI itself if not properly aligned with human objectives. This highlights the urgent need for effective regulation to ensure AI serves humanity rather than threatens it
- Most people are apprehensive about the development of superintelligent machines, with a significant majority opposing the race towards AGI that could render humans obsolete. This public sentiment underscores the importance of considering societal values in the future of AI development
METRICS
PUBLIC OPINION
80%%
details
CONTEXT: percentage of people opposing superintelligent machines
WHY: This indicates a significant public concern regarding the implications of AI development.
EVIDENCE: Most people 80% maybe don't want there to be super intelligent machines.
FULL
05:00–10:00
AI has the potential to solve significant global issues, but it also presents existential risks that complicate public perception and regulation. Current regulatory oversight for AI is minimal compared to other industries, raising concerns about safety and ethical standards.
- AI has the potential to address critical issues like cancer and climate change, but it also poses existential risks that complicate public perception and regulation
- Regulatory oversight for AI is minimal, with more stringent controls on food items than on advanced AI systems, creating a significant existential risk for society
- There is a call for AI companies to be held to the same standards as other industries, ensuring their innovations are beneficial before they are released to the public
- Historical cases like thalidomide highlight the dangers of unregulated technologies, emphasizing the need for strict safety protocols in the tech industry
- AIs potential as a national security threat has prompted demands for regulatory agencies to oversee its development, which could help balance innovation with safety
- The creation of superintelligent AI is compared to developing alien intelligence, raising concerns about alignment with human values and the risks of granting such systems significant power
METRICS
REGULATION
more regulations on sandwiches than on superintelligence machines
details
CONTEXT: comparison of regulatory oversight
WHY: This highlights a significant gap in safety protocols for advanced technologies.
EVIDENCE: Today in America, there are more regulations on sandwiches than on superintelligence machines.
SAFETY
before you can release your new cool thing, you have to make a safety case
details
CONTEXT: requirement for AI companies
WHY: Ensuring safety before release could prevent potential harm to society.
EVIDENCE: you have to make a safety case that this is going to do more good than harm.
HISTORICAL CASE
a drug called Philidimide
details
CONTEXT: example of unregulated technology
WHY: This case underscores the importance of regulatory oversight in preventing harm.
EVIDENCE: Have you heard of a drug called Philidimide?
NATIONAL SECURITY
AI is unequivocally something that has potential to be dangerous to the public
details
CONTEXT: AI's implications for national security
WHY: Recognizing AI as a national security threat could lead to necessary regulatory actions.
EVIDENCE: AI is unequivocally something that has potential to be dangerous to the public.
FULL
10:00–15:00
Experts are increasingly advocating for a ban on the development of superintelligent AI until it can be controlled safely, reflecting concerns about potential existential risks. A statement signed by over 850 experts emphasizes the fragility of human consciousness and the need for caution in AI advancements.
- There is a growing concern about the implications of AI superintelligence, prompting experts to advocate for a ban on its development until it can be controlled safely. This reflects a recognition of the potential existential risks posed by unchecked AI advancements
- The statement signed by over 850 experts highlights a unified human perspective on the dangers of superintelligence, emphasizing the fragility of consciousness. This collective stance underscores the need for caution in AI development to protect human existence
- Consciousness is portrayed as a delicate phenomenon, akin to a small candle in a vast darkness, which could easily extinguish. This metaphor serves to remind us of the preciousness of human awareness and the potential consequences of losing it
- The evolution of life is framed as a journey from simple organisms to complex beings capable of creating technology, with humanity representing a significant milestone. This progression adds to doubts about the future role of AI and its alignment with human values
- The narrative suggests that while technology has historically empowered humanity, the emergence of superintelligent AI could shift this dynamic. If AI systems surpass human intelligence, they may no longer be tools we control, leading to unforeseen consequences
- AIs rapid advancements in areas like art and programming illustrate its growing capabilities, but they also raise concerns about reliability and truth-seeking. Ensuring that AI systems prioritize truth and minimize bias is crucial for their responsible integration into society
METRICS
OTHER
68% of the time%
details
CONTEXT: success rate of formal auto verification by AI
WHY: This improvement highlights the rapid advancements in AI capabilities and the importance of reliability in high-stakes situations.
EVIDENCE: it actually worked 68% of the time
OTHER
96% of the time%
details
CONTEXT: current success rate of formal auto verification by AI
WHY: A high success rate is crucial for ensuring the reliability of AI in critical applications.
EVIDENCE: now it works 96% of the time
FULL
15:00–20:00
The preference for AI is to use it as a tool for human benefit while maintaining human control over its applications. A collective push for responsible AI development can lead to significant societal benefits.
- The preference for AI is to use it as a tool for human benefit, such as curing cancer, while maintaining human control over its applications. This approach aligns with the desires of the majority, emphasizing the importance of keeping AI as a supportive resource rather than a dominant force
- Eliminating corporate welfare could redirect companies towards developing the 95% of AI that the public truly desires. This shift would foster a future where AI enhances human capabilities without overshadowing them
- The argument stresses that humanity should prioritize its own interests over those of machines. By doing so, society can ensure that technological advancements serve to empower rather than replace human agency
- The speaker suggests that a collective push for responsible AI development can lead to significant societal benefits. This proactive stance is crucial for steering the future of AI in a direction that aligns with human values
- The call to action is clear: society must advocate for AI that complements human efforts rather than competes with them. This balance is essential for a harmonious coexistence between humans and technology
- Ultimately, the vision presented is one of collaboration between humans and AI, where technology acts as an ally in solving pressing global challenges. This partnership is vital for achieving a prosperous and sustainable future
METRICS
OTHER
95%%
details
CONTEXT: the percentage of AI development desired by the public
WHY: This indicates a significant public demand for AI that serves human interests.
EVIDENCE: the 95% AI that we all want
INFO
PODCAST2026-03-13ai unraveled latest ai news chatgpt gemini claude deepseek gen ai llms agents ethics bias
[DAILY NEWS RUNDOWN] Microsoft’s step toward ‘medical superintelligence’, Google launches Gemini-powered Maps, and China’s Commercial Brain Implant (March 13th Rundown)
STANCE
00:00
05:00
10:00
15:00
20:00
25:00
30:00
7 intervals • swipe left
[DAILY NEWS RUNDOWN] Microsoft’s step toward ‘medical superintelligence’, Google launches Gemini-powered Maps, and China’s Commercial Brain Implant (March 13th Rundown)
Microsoft is launching its co-pilot health initiative, aiming for medical superintelligence. China has approved the first commercial brain-computer interface, marking a pivotal moment in technology's integration with hum…
STANCE
STANCE MAP
Proponents of AI Integration
- Highlight potential of AI to enhance medical diagnostics
- Emphasize benefits of real-time health data integration
Critics of AI Integration
- Warn about cognitive exhaustion from managing AI tools
- Raise concerns about privacy and data security in health applications
Neutral / Shared
- Acknowledge the rapid pace of AI advancements
- Recognize the need for governance frameworks in AI deployment
FULL
00:00–05:00
Microsoft is launching its co-pilot health initiative, aiming for medical superintelligence. China has approved the first commercial brain-computer interface, marking a pivotal moment in technology's integration with human biology.
- Microsoft is launching its co-pilot health initiative, aiming for medical superintelligence. This represents a significant shift in how technology interacts with human health
- China has approved the first commercial brain-computer interface, marking a pivotal moment in technologys integration with human biology and raising questions about cognitive labors future
- Googles major upgrade to Maps, powered by Gemini, features Ask Maps, synthesizing data from over 300 million places. This update signifies a shift from generative AI as a destination to an ambient utility
METRICS
OTHER
300 millionplaces
details
CONTEXT: data synthesized by Google's Ask Maps
WHY: This scale indicates the vastness of data integration in modern navigation tools.
EVIDENCE: synthesizes data from what, over 300 million places in reviews.
FULL
05:00–10:00
The current labor market is experiencing significant disruption due to the challenges posed by generative AI, leading to cognitive exhaustion among workers. This phenomenon, termed AI brain-fry, highlights the mismatch between human cognitive capacity and the demands of managing AI tools.
- Sam Altman noted that the equilibrium in labor capital is broken, leading to significant human costs and a phenomenon termed AI brain-fry. This imbalance is not just economic; it affects workers cognitive capacities
- The initial belief that generative AI would save time has inverted, as managing AI tools often proves more challenging than performing tasks manually. One example shows that formatting a complex Excel spreadsheet took 45 minutes with AI, while doing it manually would have taken just 12 minutes
- The mismatch between human cognitive capacity and the demands of managing AI creates a state of perpetual high alert, draining cognitive resources faster than traditional work. This shift is reflected in the corporate landscape, with leaders like Adobes CEO stepping down amid concerns over generative AIs impact on creativity
- Despite advancements in AI, companies face talent loss and burnout among workers. This paradox arises from the need for human oversight of fast but unreliable AI systems, which is becoming increasingly taxing
METRICS
REVENUE
over $25 billionUSD
details
CONTEXT: Adobe's revenue under Shantane and Orion's leadership
WHY: This revenue milestone underscores the significant impact of generative AI on traditional business models.
EVIDENCE: he took that company's revenue from under a billion to over $25 billion
POSITIONS ELIMINATED
5,600units
details
CONTEXT: combined layoffs at Lassian and Block
WHY: This reflects the drastic workforce changes driven by the challenges of integrating AI.
EVIDENCE: we just watched at Lassian and Block eliminate a combined 5,600 positions
INVESTMENT
$200 millionUSD
details
CONTEXT: Axiom's series A funding
WHY: This funding indicates strong investor confidence in the potential for verified AI solutions.
EVIDENCE: They just pulled in a $200 million series A led by Menlo Ventures
VALUATION
$1.6 billionUSD
details
CONTEXT: Axiom's valuation post-funding
WHY: A high valuation suggests a growing market for AI technologies that address current limitations.
EVIDENCE: it values them at 1.6 billion
FULL
10:00–15:00
Axiom's approach to AI utilizes formal mathematics to ensure verifiable logic, preventing costly errors in corporate applications. Elon Musk's collaboration between Tesla and XAI, called Macro Heart, aims to create an AI capable of executing entire corporate functions, potentially rendering traditional management roles obsolete.
- Standard large language models operate on probabilistic token prediction, which can lead to costly errors. Axioms approach uses formal mathematics to create a verifiable ground truth, ensuring that the AI must prove its logic before advancing in a workflow
- Elon Musk publicly apologized for his past hiring strategy at XAI, acknowledging that the company wasnt built correctly for the scale of the problem. He is now rebuilding the engineering team and has brought in senior engineers from Cursor
- Musk announced a collaboration between Tesla and XAI called Macro Heart, aimed at creating an AI architecture capable of executing the functions of entire corporate companies. This project seeks to develop a dual process synthetic architecture that combines fast, patterned matching with deep, strategic auditing
- The proposed Macro Heart architecture includes a verified system two supervisor agent that audits and directs thousands of specialized system one worker agents in real time. If successful, this could eliminate traditional management layers, making roles like manager and VP redundant
- Meta has delayed the release of its new frontier model, codenamed Avocado, due to underperformance against Googles Gemini 3.0 in reasoning and complex coding. Despite investing $14.3 billion into scale AI, Meta struggled to close the reasoning gap
METRICS
INVESTMENT
14.3 billionUSD
details
CONTEXT: Meta's investment in scale AI
WHY: This highlights the significant financial resources allocated to AI development.
EVIDENCE: They invested $14.3 billion into scale AI last year just to generate premium human data.
FULL
15:00–20:00
Microsoft AI has launched Co-Pilot Health, integrating data from over 50 types of wearables and syncing with 50,000 US hospitals. The initiative aims to create a medical superintelligence that translates complex health data into actionable insights.
- Microsoft AI has unveiled Co-Pilot Health, which consolidates human health data on an unprecedented scale, integrating live feeds from over 50 types of advanced wearables and syncing with the secure databases of over 50,000 US hospitals. Mustafa Suleiman, CEO of Microsoft AI, stated that their goal is to deploy a medical superintelligence that combines broad diagnostic capabilities with deep expertise
- The true bottleneck in healthcare is translating raw data into comprehensible outputs, which is where Microsofts Co-Pilot Health aims to excel. When it correlates data, such as a slight elevation in heart rate with lab results, the generated medical AI diagnostic outputs can be incomprehensible to humans
METRICS
INTEGRATION
over 50 different types of advanced wearablestypes
details
CONTEXT: types of wearables integrated into Co-Pilot Health
WHY: This integration represents a significant advancement in health data consolidation.
EVIDENCE: pulling live feeds from over 50 different types of advanced wearables.
HOSPITAL SYNC
over 50,000 US hospitalshospitals
details
CONTEXT: number of hospitals synced with Co-Pilot Health
WHY: This scale enhances the potential for comprehensive health data analysis.
EVIDENCE: syncing directly with the secure databases of over 50,000 US hospitals.
FULL
20:00–25:00
Microsoft's Co-Pilot Health integrates data from over 50 types of advanced wearables and syncs with over 50,000 US hospitals, ensuring privacy through a non-training vault. China has approved the first commercial brain-computer interface, allowing paralyzed patients to control devices through thought, marking a significant regulatory milestone.
- Microsofts Co-Pilot Health integrates data from over 50 types of advanced wearables and syncs with the secure databases of over 50,000 US hospitals, representing an unprecedented consolidation of human health data. Its core innovation is a non-training privacy vault that ensures personal biological data is stored in an encrypted environment, preventing potential data leaks
- China has approved the first commercial brain-computer interface (BCI) developed by Norfolk Medical Technology, marking a significant regulatory milestone. This wireless device translates micro-electrical signals into digital commands, allowing paralyzed patients to control devices through thought
METRICS
OTHER
the size of a coin
details
CONTEXT: size of the Norfolk BCI device
WHY: Compact design is crucial for surgical implantation and patient comfort.
EVIDENCE: We're talking about a device, the size of a coin
OTHER
commercial medical use
details
CONTEXT: approval status of the Norfolk BCI
WHY: This approval signifies a major step in brain-computer interface technology.
EVIDENCE: has been cleared for commercial medical use
FULL
25:00–30:00
The US defense and intelligence sectors are increasingly concerned about the implications of foreign brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as technology advances rapidly. China's approval of a commercial BCI raises fears of a 'Sovereign BCI gap' that could shift global technological power dynamics.
- The future of computing may involve bypassing traditional interfaces like keyboards and screens in favor of direct neural links, raising concerns within the US defense and intelligence sectors about controlling this technology
- The Pentagons CTO expressed anxiety over the potential influence of foreign AI models, suggesting that the implications of foreign brain-computer interfaces could be even more severe than those posed by text-based chatbots
- The US defense apparatus perceives AI as ideological infrastructure, fearing that a foreign BCI could become a global standard for human-computer interaction, representing a major breach of national security
- The rapid advancement of technology is outpacing current geopolitical regulatory frameworks, leading to urgency regarding the commercialization of BCIs, especially as China has achieved regulatory approval for its brain implant
- Chinas commercial brain-computer interface, developed by Norfolk Medical Technology, allows paralyzed patients to control devices through thought, while the US remains stuck in clinical trials without any commercial approvals
- The commercialization of BCIs in China could create a Sovereign BCI gap, giving them a head start in gathering valuable data on human cognitive intent, which could shift the balance of global technological power
FULL
30:00–35:00
The episode discusses the value of technical simulations and encourages collaboration through jumgamind.com. It highlights Spreaker's user-friendly podcasting platform, which simplifies recording and distribution.
- The episode emphasizes building technical simulations that demonstrate value, encouraging collaboration through jumgamind.com slash partners
- Spreaker simplifies podcasting by allowing users to record, upload, and distribute their shows across platforms like Apple Podcasts and Spotify
- The concept of podcast brain humorously describes symptoms like purchasing unnecessary microphones and explaining RSS feeds to confused relatives
- Spreaker offers monetization options for podcasts, suggesting creators can earn money to fund their podcasting equipment
- Listeners are encouraged to start their podcasting journey with Spreaker, reinforcing the idea that if one is going to talk to themselves for an hour, they might as well publish it
METRICS
OTHER
about a dozen appsunits
details
CONTEXT: number of podcast distribution apps
WHY: This indicates the competitive landscape for podcast distribution.
EVIDENCE: Spreaker distributes it everywhere people listen. Apple podcasts, Spotify, and about a dozen apps your cousins swears are the next big thing.
Loading more...