Intel / Intelligence Leaks
Steve Baker's Investigations and Dismissal from The Blaze
Steve Baker, an investigative journalist, was fired from The Blaze after probing into the January 6 pipe bomber case. His dismissal raises concerns about potential external pressures from the FBI, suggesting a troubling influence on media narratives.
Source material: Steve Baker: January 6th Pipe Bomber Cover-Up, Blaze TV Firing, & his missing Megyn Kelly Interview
Summary
Steve Baker, an investigative journalist, was fired from The Blaze after probing into the January 6 pipe bomber case. His dismissal raises concerns about potential external pressures from the FBI, suggesting a troubling influence on media narratives.
Baker's investigations revealed significant discrepancies in evidence related to the case, particularly regarding the identity of the alleged bomber, Brian Cole. High-level prosecutors have indicated that the case against Cole is weak, leading to public skepticism about his guilt.
Baker's health crisis during his investigation has raised questions about potential external influences affecting his well-being. He is now focusing on independent journalism and plans to release critical findings related to his work.
Baker is utilizing crowdfunding to support his investigative efforts, emphasizing the need for financial backing to continue his work. His departure from The Blaze was primarily due to disagreements over handling a potential defamation lawsuit.
Perspectives
Analysis of Steve Baker's investigative work and the implications of his dismissal from The Blaze.
Steve Baker and Supporters
- Claims that Bakers firing was influenced by FBI pressure regarding his reporting
- Argues that the evidence against Brian Cole is weak and insufficient for conviction
- Highlights discrepancies in the investigation that raise doubts about the official narrative
- Accuses the DOJ of pressuring Cole to accept a plea deal to expedite the case resolution
Mainstream Media and DOJ
- Denies any wrongdoing in the handling of the January 6 investigation
- Claims that the evidence against Cole is valid and sufficient for prosecution
- Rejects allegations of external pressure influencing media narratives
- Questions the credibility of Bakers claims and his motivations for independent journalism
Neutral / Shared
- Notes that Baker is building a new platform for independent reporting
- Mentions the ongoing investigation into the January 6 events and its implications
Metrics
other
five-month gag order months
duration of the gag order imposed on Baker
This highlights the extent of control exerted over journalists.
I was put under by the blaze after our November 8th story came out.
subscriptions
hemorrhaging subscriptions units
The Blaze's subscription status
Declining subscriptions indicate financial instability and potential impacts on editorial independence.
they are hemorrhaging subscriptions
calls
five specific calls units
Calls from the FBI to The Blaze executives
The number of calls suggests significant pressure from federal agencies on media outlets.
I know specifically because I've been told by the blaze executives of five specific calls
other
more than 20 million Americans people
number of Americans dealing with long COVID symptoms
This highlights the widespread impact of long COVID on the population.
more than 20 million Americans are still dealing with long covid symptoms
other
$11 billion USD
annual budget of the FBI
This budget highlights the resources allocated to national security, questioning the agency's effectiveness.
$11 billion a year agency
other
top secret
classification of the leaked memo
The classification indicates the sensitivity of the information involved.
this memo was marked at the top secret
other
draft memo still in circulation
status of the memo
The draft status suggests ongoing discussions and potential changes to the investigation.
it was only a draft memo still in circulation
other
calls warning them not to run
pressure on journalists
This indicates a systematic effort to control the narrative surrounding the investigation.
reporters specifically to complain
Key entities
Timeline highlights
00:00–05:00
Steve Baker was terminated from The Blaze after investigating the January 6 pipe bomber, raising concerns about external pressures from the FBI. His experience highlights the challenges faced by independent journalists in addressing controversial topics and the potential suppression of certain narratives by mainstream media.
- Steve Baker was terminated from The Blaze after revealing sensitive details about the January 6 pipe bomber, raising concerns about possible external pressures from the FBI and media avoidance of the issue
- After a five-month silence imposed by The Blaze, Baker is now free to discuss his findings, asserting that honesty is his only guideline for public discourse
- An anticipated interview with Megyn Kelly remains unreleased, with Baker suggesting that legal issues regarding his dismissal and intelligence community involvement may be the cause of the delay
- Baker asserts he shared crucial insights during the Kelly interview about his firing and the FBIs involvement, indicating a reluctance to confront uncomfortable truths in the media
- The mainstream medias lack of engagement with Bakers findings points to a possible coordinated effort to suppress certain narratives, raising questions about journalistic integrity
- Bakers experience underscores the difficulties independent journalists face when tackling controversial subjects, highlighting the need for accountability in both media and government
05:00–10:00
Steve Baker was fired from The Blaze after alleged FBI pressure regarding his reporting on the January 6 pipe bomber. His dismissal raises concerns about the influence of federal agencies on media narratives and the challenges faced by independent journalists.
- Steve Bakers firing from The Blaze followed alleged pressure from the FBI regarding his reporting on the January 6 pipe bomber, raising concerns about federal influence on media narratives
- Baker claims he shared important insights during an unreleased interview with Megyn Kelly, suggesting that legal issues may be delaying its publication
- Initially, The Blaze supported Bakers critical reporting despite FBI pressure, indicating a complicated relationship between media outlets and government agencies on sensitive topics
- Baker alleges that the FBI made multiple calls to The Blaze executives, urging them to restrict his reporting, highlighting the risks journalists face in politically charged investigations
- The circumstances of Bakers dismissal and the stalled Kelly interview reflect broader issues of censorship and the challenges faced by independent journalists, emphasizing the need for media transparency
- Bakers situation serves as a cautionary tale about the vulnerabilities of investigative journalism in todays political environment, with potential implications for future reporting
10:00–15:00
Steve Baker faced significant pressure from the FBI regarding his reporting on the January 6 events, leading to his dismissal from The Blaze. This situation raises concerns about media independence and the influence of powerful institutions on journalistic integrity.
- Steve Bakers investigations into the January 6th events led to significant pressure from the FBI on The Blaze, including attempts to suppress his reporting, which raises concerns about media independence
- Baker learned that Cash Patel had reached out to Glenn Beck regarding his work, indicating that influential figures were worried about the implications of his findings
- Initially, The Blazes leadership backed Bakers reporting despite FBI pressure, reflecting a commitment to journalistic integrity amid external threats
- Bakers firing from The Blaze raises concerns about the companys editorial stability and its approach to controversial subjects, suggesting potential internal conflicts
- The challenges faced by Baker and the whistleblowers he reported on highlight the risks for those who challenge powerful institutions, often resulting in severe personal consequences
- The ongoing discourse on long COVID and its impact on brain health underscores the necessity for further research and public awareness, as millions of Americans continue to experience symptoms
15:00–20:00
The FBI's handling of the January 6th pipe bomber case raises significant concerns about its effectiveness and accountability. Independent investigations are deemed necessary as vital information may be overlooked by official sources.
- The FBIs inaction on the January 6th pipe bomber case raises serious questions about its effectiveness and accountability in national security matters
- Many FBI whistleblowers have not received the promised support, eroding trust in the agencys commitment to justice
- The FBIs increasing outreach to media figures indicates a concern about the narrative surrounding whistleblower stories, suggesting attempts to control damaging information
- Choosing to report findings to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence instead of the FBI reflects a significant distrust in the latters integrity
- A journalists accidental discovery of a link to the pipe bomber highlights the necessity of independent investigations, as vital information may be missed by official sources
- A timeline detailing the identification of the suspect will soon be released, which could enhance public understanding of the case and the involved agencies
20:00–25:00
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is investigating potential threats related to the January 6th pipe bomber, raising concerns about intelligence misuse against citizens. A leaked memo from the ODNI has cast doubt on the integrity of the investigation and highlighted issues of accountability within intelligence agencies.
- The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is probing potential threats linked to the January 6th pipe bomber, raising concerns about the misuse of intelligence against citizens
- A memo from the ODNI warning intelligence agencies about a national security threat was leaked, casting doubt on the investigations integrity
- Allegations suggest that the CIA and FBI may have tried to conceal the pipe bombers identity, highlighting issues of accountability within these agencies
- Some journalists have reported receiving FBI warnings against further investigation, indicating a possible effort to manage the narrative
- The investigations outcomes could significantly impact public trust in intelligence agencies, especially if cover-up claims are substantiated
- This situation underscores the difficulties independent journalists encounter when covering sensitive government-related issues, often facing pushback that complicates their efforts
25:00–30:00
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is reportedly attempting to address a national security threat based on Steve Baker's findings, but this effort is allegedly being undermined by the FBI and CIA. Baker has faced warnings suggesting that the FBI is trying to halt his investigative work, raising concerns about government agencies suppressing information.
- The Office of Director of National Intelligence is reportedly trying to address a national security threat based on Steve Bakers findings, but this effort is allegedly being undermined by the FBI and CIA, which are accused of suppressing information
- Baker has received warnings from various sources indicating that the FBI is attempting to halt his investigative work, suggesting a broader effort to control the narrative regarding the January 6th pipe bomber
- In a recent conversation with a Daily Wire reporter, multiple intelligence sources claimed Baker was leaking sensitive information, which he strongly denied, asserting he was the one providing information
- Baker recounted his visit to the National Counterterrorism Center, where he presented evidence related to the case, emphasizing he did not receive leaks from Joe Kent, countering other claims
- The Daily Wire reporter later acknowledged Bakers explanation, hinting at a potential shift in conservative medias approach to the narrative surrounding his work
- The ongoing suppression of information by government agencies raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability, highlighting the challenges faced by independent journalists covering sensitive national security topics